Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis of two organogold(I) complexes, [(Au(NCN))2(dppbp)] (6) and [(Au(Phebox))2(dppbp)] (9), and their application in subsequent transmetalating reactions are described. A trinuclear organogold(I) complex, [(AuCl)3(tdpppb)] (4) is also reported, which exhibits a surprisingly high solubility in dichloromethane. It was found that 6 and 9 can cleanly transfer the anionic NCN-([C(6)H(3)(CH(2)NMe(2))2-2,6]-) or Phebox-([2,6-bis(oxazolinyl)phenyl]-) moiety to Ti(IV) and Pd(II) centers, respectively. The coproduct [(AuCl)2(dppbp)] (3, dppbp is [4-Ph(2)PC(6)H(4)]2 (1)) formed during this transmetalation reaction, precipitates almost quantitatively from the reaction mixture (toluene) and can thus be separated by simple filtration. In comparison, [AuCl(PPh3)], formed as the coproduct in the transmetalation reaction of [Au(NCN)(PPh3)] with metal salts, has a higher solubility in apolar solvents and thus is more difficult to separate from the resultant organometallic complex. Digold complex 6 has been characterized by NMR spectroscopy and crystallographic analyses. These analyses show that the two gold units are essentially independent. The formation of a dimetallic transmetalating agent based on gold(I) had no effect on its transmetalating properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stol et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: