The H-H distance of the dihydrogen ligand in [Ru(H…H)(C5Me5)(dppm)]BF4 is 1.08(3) A as determined by neutron diffraction on a crystal of volume 3.2 mm3 at 15 K: monoclinic, space group P21, a = 10.833(3), b = 15.045(4), c = 10.781(2) Å, β = 114.47(2)°, V= 1599.3(7) Å3, and Dc = 1.473 g cm-3 for Z = 2; R(F) = 0.071, R(F2) = 0.151, Rw(F2) = 0.099 for 4198 reflections. The H-H distance, when corrected for the effects of thermal motion, lengthens slightly from 1.08 (3) to 1.10(3) Å. The complex contains an elongated dihydrogen ligand which is symmetrically, side-on bonded to the ruthenium as one leg of a three-legged piano stool structure. The H2 ligand lies parallel to the C5Me5 ligand plane, an orientation where π-overlap with an a "d orbital on the metal is optimum. The T1 NMR method gives an H-H distance of 1.10(1) Å for the case of restricted rotation. The present structure provides a model for coordinated H2 at an intermediate stage of oxidative addition. The 1J(H,D) coupling in the Ru(H-D) isotopomer increases with decreasing temperature; this is interpreted as a slight shortening of the H-D distance. The structural and 1H NMR data are compared for dihydrogen complexes which have been studied by single crystal neutron diffraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klooster et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: