Why the study?
RBM20 mutations cause severe, early-onset cardiomyopathies and affect alternative splicing, but the pathomechanisms of specific mutations across different functional domains remained to be defined.
Disease-associated variants in RBM20 lead to aberrant splicing through different pathomechanisms depending on the mutation's location, which may inform future therapeutic strategies for RBM20-induced cardiomyopathies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Different RBM20 variants may involve distinct mechanisms; hypothesis-generating for targeted therapies in cardiomyopathy, pending human validation.
Mutations in RBM20 encoding the RNA-binding motif protein 20 (RBM20) are associated with an early onset and clinically severe forms of cardiomyopathies. Transcriptome analyses revealed RBM20 as an important regulator of cardiac alternative splicing. RBM20 mutations are especially localized in exons 9 and 11 including the highly conserved arginine and serine-rich domain (RS domain). Here, we investigated in several cardiomyopathy patients, the previously described RBM20-mutation p.Pro638Leu localized within the RS domain. In addition, we identified in a patient the novel mutation p.Val914Ala localized in the (glutamate-rich) Glu-rich domain of RBM20 encoded by exon 11. Its impact on the disease was investigated with a novel TTN- and RYR2-splicing assay based on the patients' cardiac messenger RNA. Furthermore, we showed in cell culture and in human cardiac tissue that mutant RBM20-p.Pro638Leu is not localized in the nuclei but causes an abnormal cytoplasmic localization of the protein. In contrast the splicing deficient RBM20-p.Val914Ala has no influence on the intracellular localization. These results indicate that disease-associated variants in RBM20 lead to aberrant splicing through different pathomechanisms dependent on the localization of the mutation. This might have an impact on the future development of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of RBM20-induced cardiomyopathies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaertner et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: