Why the study?
Does 24-hour ECG monitoring detect an excess of arrhythmias in patients with transient non-focal neurological symptoms compared to controls?
Does 24-hour ECG monitoring detect an excess of arrhythmias in patients with transient non-focal neurological symptoms compared to controls?
Ambulatory ECG monitoring reveals a significantly higher prevalence of bradyarrhythmias in patients with transient non-focal neurological symptoms, and a higher overall arrhythmia rate in young patients, suggesting clinical relevance in these groups.
May support targeted monitoring in transient non-focal symptoms; leaves open whether detection improves outcomes.
Eighty-nine patients attending neurology clinics with transient non-focal neurological symptoms were studied by routine electrocardiography and 24-hour monitoring of the electrocardiography and 24-hour monitoring of the electrocardiogram. In comparison with 109 control subjects there was no significant overall excess of arrhythmias (age-adjusted odds ratio 1.7, kappa2 = 2.67) except in the subgroup of patients under the age of 30 (odds ratio 11.6, p less than 0.05). Bradyarrhythmias, but not tachyarrhythmias, were significantly more common in the patients (odds ratio 7.4, p less than 0.001),. Since patients can rarely be studied while they are having symptoms a working diagnosis must be based on a balance of probabilities: arrhythmias in young patients, or bradyarrhythmias in any patient, are likely to be clinically relevant. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring contributed to the diagnosis in at least 25 of the patients, Nevertheless, the extent to which further investigations are pursued, and the form of treatment ultimately adopted, must also be influenced by the frequency and severity of the patients' symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bono et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: