Why the study?
Repeatability, reproducibility, and reference intervals of right atrial longitudinal strain indices derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography in dogs without heart disease were not established.
What are the repeatability, reproducibility, and reference intervals for right atrial longitudinal strain indices derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography in healthy dogs?
What are the repeatability, reproducibility, and reference intervals for right atrial longitudinal strain indices derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography in healthy dogs?
Right atrial longitudinal strain indices derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography are repeatable and reproducible in healthy dogs, though age must be considered in their interpretation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports repeatable RALS assessment in healthy dogs; leaves open validation for clinical use and diseased populations.
OBJECTIVE: To determine repeatability, reproducibility, and reference intervals of indices of right atrial longitudinal strain (RALS) derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in dogs without heart disease. ANIMALS: 110 client-owned dogs and 10 laboratory Beagles. PROCEDURES: To determine intraobserver within-day (repeatability) and interobserver (reproducibility) coefficients of variation, RALS during ventricular systole (ϵS), ventricular early diastole (ϵE), and atrial systole (ϵA), as derived with STE, were obtained by 2 investigators for 5 randomly selected client-owned dogs and analyzed by linear regression. Reference intervals were estimated from the results of all dogs. Correlations between RALS indices (ϵS, ϵE, and ϵA) and sex, age, body weight, heart rate, and blood pressure were determined. RESULTS: RALS derived from STE showed good intraobserver within-day repeatability and interobserver reproducibility, with coefficients of variation of < 20%. Both ϵS and ϵE were significantly negatively correlated with age, but ϵA was not correlated with age. Indices were not correlated with sex, body weight, or blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: RALS indices derived from STE were repeatable and reproducible and were affected by the age of dogs without heart disease. Age should be considered in the interpretation of RALS indices in clinical settings. Further studies are needed to apply RALS indices for assessing dogs with heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morita et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: