BACKGROUND: J pouch-anal anastomosis is thought to give superior functional results to straight coloanal anastomosis after rectal resection. Follow-up studies have suggested that this improvement is not maintained and that evacuatory difficulties may increase. METHODS: Some 119 consecutive patients had a coloanal anastomosis after resection for rectal carcinoma over 113 months, 62 with a J pouch and 57 with a straight coloanal anastomosis. Functional results were determined by patient questionnaire. The two groups were compared for the first and second 5-year intervals of study. RESULTS: Patients who had a J pouch had significantly better median Kirwan continence scores for the duration of the study and 5-9 years after surgery: 1 versus 2 (P = 0.05) and 1 versus 2 (P < 0.01), respectively. Some 5-9 years after surgery the median number of nocturnal bowel movements was significantly lower in patients who had a J pouch than in those with a straight coloanal anastomosis (0 versus 1; P = 0.02). Similarly, significantly better results were seen with regard to evacuation difficulties and urgency of defaecation. CONCLUSION: The function of the J pouch was superior to that of the straight coloanal anastomosis and appeared to improve with time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: