The Pratt-Arrow measure of absolute risk aversion, as defined by r(x} = u"{x}/u' (x}, is well known to be "invariant to linear transformations." However, this invariance property applies with respect to transformations of u and not with respect to arbitrary rescalings of x. The effects of this misunderstanding has led to ambiguity as to what actually constitutes behavior tnat is "slightly risk averse," "very risk averse," etc. The use of the coefficient in "per acre" analyses is particularly addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raskin et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: