Why the study?
How is three-dimensional echocardiography used to evaluate right heart pathology?
How is three-dimensional echocardiography used to evaluate right heart pathology?
Three-dimensional echocardiography is a valuable imaging modality for the detailed anatomical and functional assessment of complex right-sided heart pathologies.
May aid complex right heart assessment; leaves open standardization and outcome validation in prospective studies.
Three‐dimensional (3‐D) echocardiography uses sequentially acquired tomography echocardiographic data, which is gated to the cardiac cycle, to reconstruct 3‐D views of the heart. So far, this technique has been used primarily to evaluate left‐sided heart structures. This report focuses on congenital and acquired right‐sided heart pathologies that have been visualized by 3‐D echocardiography. In addition to reviewing the literature, several representative figures are included illustrating the unique ability of 3‐D echo to elucidate complex right heart anatomy. After a brief introduction to the technical aspects of 3‐D echocardiography, the discussion centers on evaluation of congenital heart disease and right‐sided masses, determination of right ventricular mass and volume, and evaluation of right‐sided valvular heart disease. Congenital heart diseases that are reviewed include atrial septal defect (location, size, efficacy of repair), ventricular septal defect, and congenital heart disease in the fetus being evaluated in utero. Evaluation of right‐sided masses, including tumors, vegetations, and thrombi, is reviewed. Methods of determining right ventricular volume and mass using 3‐D echo are discussed. Evaluation of valvular heart disease, including Doppler analysis of regurgitant flow, is examined. Finally, special attention is given to the perioperative and intraoperative use of 3‐D echocardiography for patients with these conditions. The conclusion summarizes the current and potential future uses of 3‐D echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadaniantz et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: