Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Foreshock-aftershock sequences of two mine tremors, of magnitudes 1.5 and 1.2 were studied using a highly-sensitive seismic array and a tiltmeter in the source regions of the tremors. The tremors occurred at a depth of about 3.2 km in a deep gold mine adjacent to the array of six geophones and within 120 m of the tiltmeter. The seismic coverage of the sequences was complete down to magnitudes of −3.5; the tilt resolution ranged from 6 × 10−8 radians to 6 × 10−7 radians at the times of the sequences. In the first hour after each event 135 to 140 micro-aftershocks were recorded with a rate of occurrence that is generally proportional to the rate of tilt, diminishing with time, t, after the mainshock according to A(1+kt), where A and k are constants. A careful study of the records of microtremors and tilt before the main stocks revealed no indications of impending failure. Before the tremor of M = 1.5 the seismicity was at its normal ambient level of about 4 events per hour. Although the seismicity was unusually high before the event of M = 1.2 at about 30 events per hour, there was no aspect of this microshock activity suggesting that a larger tremor would follow. Similarly, analysis of the tilt records failed to produce any evidence of an instability developing before either of the tremors. The magnitude distributions, described by Log N = a − b M, for the microshocks (−3.5 ≦ M <O) are consistent with those reported previously for shocks with M ≧ O. Previous results indicating that b is stable to changes in the aseismic strain rate, θ˙, and that a = log θ˙ + K, were extended to much higher strain rates in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGarr et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: