The application of UV–Fenton processes with two chelating agents, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) and [ S, S ]-ethylenediamine- N, N ′-disuccinic acid ([ S, S ]-EDDS), for the treatment of oil sands process-affected water (OSPW) at natural pH was investigated. The half-wave potentials of Fe(III/II)NTA and Fe(III/II)EDDS and the UV photolysis of the complexes in Milli-Q water and OSPW were compared. Under optimum conditions, UV–NTA–Fenton exhibited higher efficiency than UV–EDDS–Fenton in the removal of acid extractable organic fraction (66.8% for the former and 50.0% for the latter) and aromatics (93.5% for the former and 74.2% for the latter). Naphthenic acids (NAs) removals in the UV–NTA–Fenton process (98.4%, 86.0%, and 81.0% for classical NAs, NAs + O (oxidized NAs with one additional oxygen atom), and NAs + 2O (oxidized NAs with two additional oxygen atoms), respectively) under the experimental conditions were much higher than those in the UV–H 2 O 2 (88.9%, 48.7%, and 54.6%, correspondingly) and NTA–Fenton (69.6%, 35.3%, and 44.2%, correspondingly) processes. Both UV–NTA–Fenton and UV–EDDS–Fenton processes presented promoting effect on the acute toxicity of OSPW toward Vibrio fischeri . No significant change of the NTA toxicity occurred during the photolysis of Fe(III)NTA; however, the acute toxicity of EDDS increased as the photolysis of Fe(III)EDDS proceeded. NTA is a much better agent than EDDS for the application of UV–Fenton process in the treatment of OSPW.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: