In this article, I analyze ancestral Anishinaabeg rock paintings of the Canadian Shield. I challenge traditional iconographic and iconological priorities focused on deciphering static meanings, instead proposing a framework centered on the relational and ontological dimensions of the artworks. Drawing on Indigenous metaphysics and the iconic turn, my study examines how contemporary Anishinaabeg communities interpret the paintings. I approximate an Anishinaabeg iconology that is grounded in epistemic commitments to dream work, slipstreaming, and narrative ekphrasis. This methodology directly critiques the 'authoritative gaze' of settler-colonial art history (Skinner 2014) and advocates for an iconological sovereignty that aligns with Anishinaabeg temporalities and ontologies. Ultimately, by decentering settler-state narratives, this article reveals the rock paintings as active participants in ongoing Anishinaabeg lifeways, fulfilling crucial metaphysical and political roles. This work reframes the past not as a fixed archive, but as a dynamic source of new understandings in the present and inspiration for the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Watts (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: