This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The molybdenum and tungsten 2,4,6-trimethylbenzylidynes [MesC≡M{OC(CF 3 ) 2 Ph} 3 ] ( 12a, M = Mo; 12b, M = W) were prepared and structurally characterized as related complexes to already known [MesC≡M{OC(CF 3 ) 2 Me} 3 ] ( MoF6, M = Mo; WF6, M = W). While treatment of 12a with 3-hexyne yielded the propylidyne complex [EtC≡Mo{OC(CF 3 ) 2 Ph} 3 ] ( 13 ), the tungsten congener 12b formed isolable metallacyclobutadiene (MCBD) species 14 – 16 by reaction with 3-hexyne, 1-phenyl-1-propyne, and 2,4-hexadiyne, which can be correlated with the higher electrophilicity of the tungsten complex. Furthermore, the labile MCBD [(C 3 Et 3 )Mo{OC(CF 3 ) 2 Me} 3 ] ( 17 ) was isolated at low temperature from the reaction of the highly active MoF6 catalyst with 3-hexyne and could be characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. At room temperature, the same reaction afforded [EtC≡Mo{OC(CF 3 ) 2 Me} 3 ] ( 18 ), and the equilibrium reaction with 3-hexyne to form 17 was additionally studied by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy, which allowed determining Δ H ° and Δ S ° for the formation of MCBD 17 . The experimental thermodynamic data were used to set the benchmark for DFT calculations. Moreover, the deprotiometallacyclobutadiene complex (DPMCBD) [{C 3 (Mes)(Ph)}Mo{OC(CF 3 ) 3 } 2 ] ( 19 ), prepared from [MesC≡Mo{OC(CF 3 ) 3 } 3 ] ( MoF9 ) and phenylacetylene, was isolated and structurally characterized as a decomposition product of terminal alkyne metathesis and employed in the polymerization of phenylacetylenes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ehrhorn et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: