Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 1995Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen Access

Biochemical fingerprinting compared with ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA for epidemiological typing of enterococci

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

IKIngolf KühnUniversity of BernLBLars BurmanLinde (United States)SHS HæggmanSwedish Institute

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Kühn et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8bf47ff07ad6ed43b23e71https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.11.2812-2817.1995
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Computerised biochemical fingerprinting a new tool for typing of bacteria1993 · 70 citations
  2. 2Enterococci from Bangkok, Thailand, with high-level resistance to currently available aminoglycosides1983 · 68 citations
  3. 3Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme1989 · 797 citations
  4. 4Comparison of ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for subspecies differentiation of strains of Enterococcus faecalis1993 · 88 citations
  5. 5DNA fingerprinting of Enterococcus faecium by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis may be a useful epidemiologic tool1991 · 165 citations