Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate a structured transition to adult care program for pediatric liver transplant recipients on competencies, satisfaction, rejection rates, and appointment attendance.
Does a structured transition program improve transition competencies and clinical outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients transferring to adult care?
Does a structured transition program improve transition competencies and clinical outcomes in pediatric liver transplant recipients transferring to adult care?
A structured transition program improves transition competencies and readiness in pediatric liver transplant recipients, though it did not significantly impact short-term clinical outcomes like rejection rates.
May enhance transition readiness in pediatric liver transplant recipients; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the transition to adult care program instituted for liver transplant recipients (LTRs) at a large tertiary pediatric hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Evaluation included the change in a Global Assessment Measure (GAM) before and after the transition program, satisfaction with the program, and measures of transition success including rejection rates and attendance at appointments post-transfer. We hypothesized that the introduction of our structured transition program would improve disease understanding, health system understanding, and self-care. We also hypothesized that those who had undergone the transition program would have lower failure to attend rates and lower rates of rejection than historical controls. METHODS: A LTR transition program was instituted at our service from 2013 to 2015. The program involved initial assessment of competencies with a Global Assessment Measure (GAM), followed by the introduction of a personalized goal setting program addressing issues identified in dedicated transition clinics. Assessment of competencies was compared between the commencement of the program and immediately prior to transfer. Patient satisfaction with the transition process was assessed at an interview 6-12 months after transfer to the adult service. Rejection rates and failure to attend rates were compared between the intervention group and a group of LTRs who did not receive the intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-eight LTRs participated in the study; 20 received the transition intervention and 8 served as controls. Within the intervention group, all domains of transition competency and reported anxiety regarding transferring had significantly improved at the conclusion of the intervention and all reported satisfaction with the transition program with most (81%) reporting readiness to transfer. There were no significant differences in rejection rates or failure to attend rates between those who did and did not receive the transition intervention. CONCLUSION: A longitudinal holistic transition program has the potential to positively impact the competencies and readiness of LTRs to successful transition and transfer to adult care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Culnane et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: