Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spectroscopic and computational analysis reveals a six-coordinate cobalt(IV)-oxo complex, indicating oxidation reactions are governed by electron-transfer kinetics.
Despite their implication in a number of oxidation processes, there is a paucity of well‐characterized high‐valent cobalt‐oxo complexes. In this study, we present the first example of a six‐coordinate formally Co(IV)‐oxo complex, [Co(TQA)(O)(OH)] + ( 1 , TQA = tris(2‐quinolylmethyl)amine). CSI‐MS shows the incorporation of an oxygen atom from a peracid oxidant and an additional one from water. EPR spectroscopy shows that 1 contains an S = 3 / 2 cobalt‐center, consistent with the Co IV oxidation state, while both resonance Raman ( ν = 775 cm −1 ) and EXAFS (Co─O = 1.69 Å) indicate the formation of a Co‐oxo moiety. CASSCF(11,10)/NEVPT2 calculations suggest that 1 is best described as a Co(IV)‐oxo compound with significant Co(III)‐oxyl character contributing to the ground state wavefunction. Complex 1 is relatively kinetically stable at –85°C but decays at elevated temperatures (> –50°C). We find that 1 is a competent hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and oxygen atom transfer (OAT) reagent capable of oxidizing a wide variety of substrates including toluene and N,N ‐dimethylaniline. Although H/D‐kinetic isotope studies demonstrate that proton movement takes place during the HAT rate limiting step, the substrate oxidation rate depends on substrate oxidation potential and not the C─H BDFE, suggesting these reactions are controlled by the underlying electron‐transfer process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shearer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: