Economic analysis demonstrates an efficiency coefficient model for 44 unowned hydraulic structures, indicating improved prioritization for regional infrastructure restoration financing.
The article presents a methodological approach to the economic justification of the restoration of unowned hydraulic structures (GTS) using the Moscow Region as a case study. The study is based on an analysis of the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation, materials from state and local authorities, as well as projects for the major repair and reconstruction of hydraulic structures implemented in the Moscow Region in 2024–2025. It was established that, as of 2025, 44 unowned hydraulic structures remain within the region. Based on the analysis of comparable projects, an indicative level of restoration costs was determined. A coefficient of economic efficiency for the restoration of unowned hydraulic structures is proposed, taking into account avoided damage, national economic benefits, and restoration costs. The results obtained can be used to substantiate the prioritization of financing measures aimed at the restoration of unowned hydraulic structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turapin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: