Key result
Combined exercise training drives the greatest reductions in TNF-α and CRP in metabolic syndrome.
Why the study?
The comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities on systemic inflammation in patients with metabolic syndrome remains poorly defined.
Do aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise modalities reduce inflammatory markers in patients with metabolic syndrome?
Systematic Review
Do aerobic, resistance, or combined exercise modalities reduce inflammatory markers in patients with metabolic syndrome?
Standardized Mean Difference: -1.74 (95% CI -3.06–-0.43)
Combined aerobic and resistance exercise training appears to be the most effective modality for reducing systemic inflammation (CRP and TNF-α) in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Combined or aerobic exercise reduces CRP and TNF-α in MetS; extends RCT evidence by ranking modalities while leaving IL-6 effects open.
BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of different exercise modalities on systemic inflammation in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate and rank the effects of aerobic exercise (AE), resistance training (RT), and combined training (COM) on inflammatory markers (CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6) in MetS. METHODS: A network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Data were synthesized using frequentist random-effects models. Treatment efficacy was ranked using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: Compared to the control group, all exercise modalities were associated with reductions in TNF-α levels, though the strength of this evidence is limited by high heterogeneity and potential publication bias. Among the interventions, COM showing the greatest effect (SMD = -1.74; 95% CI: -3.06 to -0.43; SUCRA = 75.7%), followed by RT and AE. For CRP, significant reductions were observed in COM (SMD = -0.79; 95% CI: -1.36 to -0.21; SUCRA = 86.8%) and AE (SMD = -0.64; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.32), while RT demonstrated a smaller effect. No modalities reached statistical significance for IL-6, although RT ranked highest in SUCRA (75.8%). Notably, CRP findings were robust with moderate certainty and no publication bias (p = 0.86), whereas TNF-α and IL-6 exhibited significant publication bias (p < 0.05) and extreme heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). CONCLUSION: Exercise, particularly COM, appears to be a promising intervention for reducing CRP and TNF-α in MetS. While the findings for CRP are robust, results for TNF-α should be interpreted with caution due to observed heterogeneity and potential publication bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chuang et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Metabolic syndrome. Combined training, aerobic exercise, and resistance training vs. Control group was evaluated on TNF-α levels (SMD -1.74, 95% CI -3.06 to -0.43). Combined exercise training demonstrated the greatest reduction in TNF-α (SMD -1.74; 95% CI -3.06 to -0.43) and CRP (SMD -0.79; 95% CI -1.36 to -0.21) in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: