Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling reveals regulatory mechanisms in mouse neural stem cells, indicating that biological variability resolves hidden differences in cell state transitions.
Inter-individual heterogeneity is often treated as noise, yet its temporal evolution can reveal regulatory mechanisms hidden from mean-field behavior. We present a stochastic framework that exploits variability for mechanistic inference in cell population dynamics. Using adult neurogenesis as a case study, we develop a state-dependent stochastic model of transitions between quiescent and active states and derive a diffusion approximation for the dynamics of both mean and variance. Applied to repeated cross-sectional data from wild-type and interferon-receptor knockout mice, we show that distinct regulatory mechanisms can produce similar mean dynamics but different fluctuation patterns. Jointly fitting mean and variance identifies proliferation-rate regulation as the dominant contributor to variability, while activation and self-renewal primarily govern average and long-term dynamics. Wild-type mice exhibit regulation of all three processes, whereas knockout mice lose activation control. These results show that population-level variability provides mechanistic information beyond average dynamics and helps distinguish between competing mechanistic models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: