Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis reveals coastal resilience focuses on economic continuity over systemic transformation in Southern Europe, suggesting the need for anticipatory governance.
Coastal blue economies face intensifying pressures from climate change, biodiversity loss and systemic uncertainty, making resilience a central concept in coastal governance. This article advances a socio-ecological-technological (SET) system framework to analyse how resilience is interpreted and operationalised in practice, drawing on a comparative study of Malta and the Algarve (Portugal). Based on interviews with public, private, academic and civil society actors, the study examines how governance arrangements shape resilience across system dimensions. Empirically, resilience is predominantly framed as the capacity to sustain economic continuity under uncertainty. Ecological systems are valued for buffering and recovery functions, and technological innovation is directed towards efficiency gains and infrastructural optimisation, reinforcing incremental adaptation rather than systemic transformation. The study conceptualises resilience as both a process and an outcome of institutional interactions and governance across system components. For policy, the findings highlight the need to institutionalise anticipatory planning, cross-sectoral coordination and long-term investment strategies that move beyond recovery towards transformative blue economy strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pace et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: