Geotechnical case study demonstrates effective seepage barrier performance in karstified limestone foundations, highlighting the necessity of real-time monitoring over standard water testing.
Curtain grouting is widely applied for seepage control in dam foundations; however, quantitative performance assessment in heterogeneous karstified formations remains methodologically challenging. This study presents an integrated evaluation of a two-row grout curtain constructed in the karstified limestone–marl foundation of the 151-m-high Chamshir roller-compacted concrete (RCC) gravity dam in Iran. The methodology combines Lugeon permeability testing, cement take analysis, real-time monitoring of descending (downstage) stage-grouting sequences, borehole deviation surveys (conducted on less than 9% of holes), and control borehole verification with pre-grouting and post-grouting comparisons. Rather than viewing split-spacing merely as a geometric layout, we analyze the physical governing mechanism: the progressive, sequential clogging of fracture networks under systematically increasing pressures—moving from wider, low-resistance pathways in primary stages to narrower fractures—which successfully reduced the average cement take by 80% (from 155 kg/m in primary holes to 31 kg/m in quaternary holes). Crucially, stage-by-stage geotechnical and hydraulic feedback captured during the sequential segmenting of boreholes provided vital real-time data to dynamically calibrate injection pressures and adaptively refine grout mix rheology during construction. Notably, several test intervals exhibited zero or low Lugeon permeability (< 1 Lu) but unexpectedly high cement take, reaching 254 kg/m at 45–50 m depth in borehole P7. This inverse relationship is attributed to clay-filled discontinuities that displace under grouting pressure, creating artificial permeability that clean-water testing fails to detect. Post-grouting control boreholes confirmed that permeability was successfully reduced to below 3 Lu across most of the treated zone. However, deviation surveys revealed that 13% of the tested holes (1 out of 8) exceeded the 2% acceptance criterion, with a maximum deviation of 4.18% at 62 m depth, highlighting critical quality assurance gaps in complex geological settings. This study demonstrates that integrating multi-disciplinary datasets—linking structural geology, stage-grouting feedback, and deviation monitoring—provides a far more reliable framework for curtain evaluation than conventional Lugeon testing alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beiranvand et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: