Methodological framework demonstrates causal discrimination protocols for neural network architectures, enabling empirical validation of complex functional claims in artificial intelligence.
This paper introduces the Intervention-Separable Architecture based on History-Dependent Dynamics (HDD-ISA), an architectural interface specification for designing or instrumenting AI architectures to turn functional claims into testable causal hypotheses. It provides: A five-stage causal chain: access → validity → engagement → effect → discrimination Construct-specific protocols for testing history-dependent prediction, causal trajectory dependence, feedback recurrence, functional self-reference, and self-modeling Design rules for architectures built to support causal testing Implementation guides for Transformers, RNN/LSTMs, and black-box LLMs Clear reporting categories: Supported, Negative Evidence, Uninterpretable, Non-Identifiable The framework serves two purposes: retrofit (testing existing architectures) and design (building new architectures with causal-discrimination interfaces from the outset). Core claim: HDD-ISA does not determine whether an architecture possesses a functional construct. It specifies the interfaces and conditions under which competing hypotheses about that construct become causally distinguishable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taotuner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: