Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis uncovers dual modes of interior and exterior agency under settler colonialism, highlighting how Indigenous communities sustain autonomous lifeworlds beyond dominant structures.
Settler-colonial theory has become an influential framework in sociology. Yet its central claim—that settler-colonialism is an enduring structure organized by a “logic of elimination”—generates a theoretical paradox. If settler-colonialism is total, how can Indigenous agency be theorized without reproducing the structure it seeks to transcend? I address this tension by bringing sociological theories of structure and agency into dialogue with settler-colonial studies and Indigenous theory. Drawing on William Sewell Jr.’s conception of structure as the coupling of cultural schemas and material resources, I reinterpret two foundational concepts: the logic of elimination and the politics of recognition. Yet Indigenous theorists highlight forms of agency that exceed sociological accounts of action within a shared structural field. I therefore distinguish between interior agency, exercised within settler structures, and exterior agency, which sustains Indigenous worlds beyond them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean Ray (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: