Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ethnographic study uncovers memory curation and identity regulation dynamics in a Chinese Indonesian association, highlighting uneven community empowerment across gender, generation, and class.
This article examines how a historically marginalized Chinese Indonesian community negotiates belonging in post-Suharto Indonesia, drawing on ethnography with the Indonesian Jinjiang Hometown Association. It argues that the association functions as an agentive institutional site rather than a passive vessel of cultural preservation, simultaneously curating collective memory and regulating members’ identity performances. As ‘memory curator’, it manages historical trauma through heroization, securitization and legitimization; as ‘identity regulator’, it orchestrates national, ethnic and class performances through mechanisms including donation-based status hierarchies and linguistic norms. These are not two separate functions but interlocking stages of a single institutional cycle, here named ‘Connection-Translation-Empowerment’, in which memory work authorizes status claims and the resulting capacity sustains further rounds of memory work. Fieldwork evidence complicates any celebratory account of this cycle: the empowerment it generates is unevenly distributed across gender, generation and ethno-cultural lines, revealing the limits of the belonging the association claims to produce.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pohling Tan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: