Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two dirhodium(II) complexes, [Rh(II)(2)(μ-O(2)CCH(3))(2)(bpy)(2)](O(2)CCH(3))(2) (Rh(2)bpy(2); bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) and [Rh(II)(2)(μ-O(2)CCH(3))(2)(phen)(2)](O(2)CCH(3))(2) (Rh(2)phen(2); phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) were synthesized, and their photocatalytic H(2) production activities were studied in multicomponent systems, containing [Ir(III)(ppy)(2)(dtbbpy)](+) (ppy = 2-phenylpyridine, dtbbpy = 4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-bipyridine) as the photosensitizer (PS) and triethylamine as the sacrificial reductant (SR). There is a more than 6-fold increase in the photocatalytic activity from Rh(2)bpy(2) to Rh(2)phen(2) just using phen in place of bpy. A turnover number as high as 2622 was obtained after 50 h of irradiation of a system containing 16.7 μM Rh(2)phen(2), 50 μM PS, and 0.6 M SR. The electrochemical, luminescence quenching, and transient absorption experiments demonstrate that Rh(I)Rh(I) is the true catalyst for the proton reduction. The real-time absorption spectra confirm that a new Rh-based species formed upon irradiation of the Rh(2)phen(2)-based multicomponent system, which exhibits an absorption centered at ∼575 nm. This 575-nm intermediate may account for the much higher H(2) evolution efficiency of Rh(2)phen(2). Our work highlights the importance of N-based chelate ligands and opens a new avenue for pursuing more efficient Rh(II)(2)-based complexes in photocatalytic H(2) production application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: