Why the study?
Does preoperative MRI evaluation of peripheral tumour growth pattern predict histopathological infiltration and clinical outcomes in patients with soft tissue sarcoma?
Does preoperative MRI evaluation of peripheral tumour growth pattern predict histopathological infiltration and clinical outcomes in patients with soft tissue sarcoma?
Preoperative MRI evaluation of peripheral tumour growth pattern in soft tissue sarcoma provides valuable prognostic information regarding the risk of metastases and local recurrence.
May inform preoperative risk stratification in soft tissue sarcoma; leaves open whether MRI growth pattern should guide therapy.
Purpose. Infiltrative microscopical peripheral growth of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has been shown to be of prognostic importance and preoperative risk stratification could individualize neoadjuvant treatment. Patients and methods. We assessed peripheral tumour growth pattern on preoperative MRI from 78 STS. The findings were correlated to histopathology and to outcome. Results. The MRI-based peripheral tumour growth pattern was classified as pushing in 34 tumours, focally infiltrative in 25, and diffusely infiltrative in 19. All tumours with diffuse infiltration on MRI also showed microscopical infiltration, whereas MRI failed to identify infiltration in two-thirds of the microscopically infiltrative tumours. Diffusely infiltrative growth on MRI gave a 2.5 times increased risk of metastases (P = .01) and a 3.7 times higher risk of local recurrence (P = .02). Discussion. Based on this observation we suggest that MRI evaluation of STS should focus on the peripheral tumour growth pattern since it adds prognostic information of value for decisions on neoadjuvant therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernebro et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: