Why the study?
Does intravenous t-PA thrombolysis improve outcomes and remain safe in acute stroke patients without major arterial occlusion compared to those with major occlusions?
Does intravenous t-PA thrombolysis improve outcomes and remain safe in acute stroke patients without major arterial occlusion compared to those with major occlusions?
Intravenous t-PA therapy in acute stroke patients without major artery occlusion appears safe and effective, yielding lower rates of hemorrhagic transformation and better 3-month functional outcomes compared to patients with major occlusions.
May support t-PA safety without major occlusion; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) thrombolysis in patients without major arterial occlusion is effective or safe. METHODS: Consecutive anterior circulation stroke patients treated with t-PA within 3 h of onset were studied. The patients were divided into three groups according to magnetic resonance angiography findings before t-PA infusion: ICA group, ICA occlusion; MCA group, M1 and M2 occlusion, and no occlusion group. Clinical characteristics, the presence of hemorrhagic transformation on T₂* at 24 h after t-PA thrombolysis, and outcome at 3 months were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: 112 patients were enrolled. The no occlusion group had 21 (18.8%) patients, the ICA group had 29 (25.9%), and the MCA group had 62 (55.4%). The frequency of hemorrhagic transformation was only 4.8% in the no occlusion group (31.0% for the ICA group, and 48.4% for the MCA group, p = 0.0012). At 3 months after t-PA therapy, 61.5% of the no occlusion group had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin score 0-1), which was the highest among the three groups (15.0% for the ICA group, and 41.5% for the MCA group, p = 0.0203). CONCLUSION: Intravenous t-PA therapy in acute stroke patients without major artery occlusion seems to be safe and effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: