Reducing ambiguity in describing plant–insect interactions: “preference”, “acceptability” and “electivity”

Ecologists and evolutionary biologists have a common interest in plant–insect interactions. Ecologists develop terminology describing patterns of association between plants and insects, while evolutionary biologists use the same words to denote potentially heritable traits of individuals. Use of the same terms to describe both traits of the interaction and traits of the organisms hinders communication. An example is “preference”, often used by ecologists to denote properties of the plant–insect interaction and by behavioural or evolutionary biologists to denote insect traits. The existing term “electivity” could be incorporated into the lexicon of plant–insect interactions to supplant the ecological use of “preference”. The term “preference” would then denote a behavioural trait of the insect. The mirror‐image trait of the plant would be “acceptability”. This could be a step towards a common terminology that would be usable by both ecologists and evolutionists.