Key result
Endoscopic vein harvesting by novice practitioners is associated with increased vein trauma and poor conduit quality, highlighting the need for a standardized, competency-based training program.
This review highlights the need for standardized training programs in endoscopic vein harvesting to mitigate the negative impacts of the learning curve on vein conduit quality and patient outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports competency-based training for endoscopic vein harvesting; leaves open effects on graft patency and outcomes.
Endoscopic vein harvesting is becoming one of the most favourable vein harvesting techniques in multiple bypass coronary surgery, due to its short term post-operative benefits with high patient satisfaction. However, long-term graft patency has been both supported and questioned in the literature. Graft failure can be affected by harvesting methods and operator's experience. Endoscopic vein harvesting is associated with a learning curve period, during which the incidence of vein trauma is high due to unfamiliarity with the surgical technique. There is a paucity of structured learning tools for novice practitioners, meaning that training differs significantly between hospital centres. Inconsistent training methods can lead to poor surgical technique, which can have a significant impact on vein quality and stress level of the practitioner. In turn, this can lead to increased postoperative complications and longer surgical duration. The main aim of this literature review is to understand the impact of the learning curve on the vein conduit and whether there is a requirement for a standardised training programme for the novice practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnamoorthy et al. (2016) conducted a review in Coronary artery bypass grafting. Endoscopic vein harvesting vs. Open vein harvesting was evaluated. Endoscopic vein harvesting by novice practitioners is associated with increased vein trauma and poor conduit quality, highlighting the need for a standardized, competency-based training program.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: