Key result
Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the Venus-P valve yielded significantly lower transvalvular pressure gradients at 6 months compared to surgical replacement (P<0.05).
Why the study?
To evaluate short-term outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the Venus-P valve in patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular systolic dysfunction after repaired complex congenital heart disease.
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Venus-P valve improve pulmonary valve function and ventricular parameters compared to surgical pulmonary valve replacement in patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=47)
No
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement with the Venus-P valve improve pulmonary valve function and ventricular parameters compared to surgical pulmonary valve replacement in patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular systolic dysfunction?
TPVR using the Venus-P valve provides comparable short-term ventricular improvements and superior transvalvular pressure gradients compared to surgical replacement in patients with complex congenital heart disease.
May favor Venus-P TPVR hemodynamics short-term in congenital disease; leaves open randomized confirmation versus surgery.
Objective To evaluate the short-term outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using the Venus-P valve in patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD) following surgical repair of complex congenital heart disease. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing Venus-P valve implantation (TPVR group, n=28) or surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR group, n=19) at Fuwai Hospital between February 2014 and February 2024. All patients had moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation with right ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% preoperatively. Postoperative pulmonary valve function and ventricular parameters were assessed at discharge and during 6-month follow-up. Results All procedures were successfully completed with no early mortality. At 6 months, the TPVR group demonstrated significantly lower pulmonary valve transvalvular pressure gradients compared to the SPVR group (P<0.05). Both groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline in NYHA functional class, biventricular ejection fractions, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (all P<0.05). The reduction in right ventricular end-diastolic diameter differed between the two groups (P<0.01); however, multivariable analysis revealed no association between this difference and surgical approach (β=4.4, P>0.05). In the TPVR group, QRS duration shortened significantly postoperatively (P<0.01), with improvements in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and cardiac index (both P<0.01), but these improvements did not differ significantly from the SPVR group (all P>0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in each group developed infective endocarditis within 1-month post-procedure; both were successfully treated with antibiotics. No other major complications were observed. Conclusion For patients with moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and RVSD, TPVR using the Venus-P valve effectively improves short-term pulmonary valve function and ventricular performance with a favorable safety profile, which shows potential as a minimally invasive alternative to SPVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Moderate-to-severe pulmonary regurgitation and right ventricular systolic dysfunction following surgical repair of complex congenital heart disease (n=47). Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) using the Venus-P valve vs. Surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR) was evaluated on Pulmonary valve transvalvular pressure gradients at 6 months (p=<0.05). Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the Venus-P valve yielded significantly lower transvalvular pressure gradients at 6 months compared to surgical replacement (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: