Key result
Interoceptive sensibility explained a significant portion of the variance in self-care management (R2 0.399), with higher body listening associated with better self-care in all dimensions.
Why the study?
The study investigated the associations between interoceptive sensibility and self-care behaviours in individuals with cardiovascular disease.
Does interoceptive sensibility improve self-care behaviors in adults with cardiovascular disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=387)
Does interoceptive sensibility improve self-care behaviors in adults with cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: R2 0.399
Interoceptive sensibility, particularly body listening and noticing, is positively associated with self-care behaviors in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Higher body listening may aid self-care; cross-sectional data leave causal effects and practice change open.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between interoceptive sensibility and self-care behaviours in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Adults with CVD were recruited for this cross-sectional descriptive study. Interoceptive sensibility was measured with the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness. Self-care was measured with the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory. Linear regression was used to describe the relationships between interoceptive sensibility and self-care dimensions. Hierarchical linear regression modelling was used to quantify additional explained variance in self-care beyond that of demographic and clinical characteristics. For this study, 387 participants were recruited through an online platform in America. Overall, interoceptive sensibility mostly explained the variance of self-care management (R20.399) (compared with the other self-care dimensions). Higher trust was associated with better self-care maintenance (P < 0.05) and higher self-care confidence (P = 0.01). Higher body listening was associated with better self-care in all dimensions (maintenance P = 0.025; monitoring and management P = 0.000; confidence P = 0.001). Higher noticing was associated with greater self-care monitoring, management, and confidence (P = 0.01, P < 0.05, and P = 0.01, respectively). Higher distraction was associated with worse self-care maintenance (P = 0.001) and lower self-care confidence (P < 0.05). Higher self-regulation was associated with worse self-care monitoring (P = 0.008). Higher worrying was associated with worse self-care management (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Interoceptive sensibility is associated with all self-care dimensions, especially management. Future studies should further explore these preliminary associations to examine causal relationships using longitudinal study designs, to examine the relationships by adding more potential covariates, and to examine whether changes in interoceptive sensibility led to changes in self-care using other study designs (e.g. Randomized Controlled Trial).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Locatelli et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in cardiovascular disease (n=387). Interoceptive sensibility was evaluated on Self-care behaviours (maintenance, monitoring, management, and confidence) (R2 0.399). Interoceptive sensibility explained a significant portion of the variance in self-care management (R2 0.399), with higher body listening associated with better self-care in all dimensions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: