Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade is minimally active in unselected castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and does not reproducibly yield durable decreases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. METHODS: The Quick Efficacy Seeking Trial was designed to employ a combination of agents to initiate an immune response (with BN-Brachyury vaccine), potentiate that response (with nogapendekin-alfa inbakicept (NAI), an interleukin (IL)-15 receptor superagonist), and reduce or eliminate immunosuppressive entities in the tumor microenvironment (with bintrafusp alfa, a dual inhibitor of programmed death-ligand 1 and transforming growth factor beta). Epacadostat (an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibitor) was also employed in one cohort to reduce immune suppression induced by IDO's conversion of tryptophan to kynurenine. RESULTS: Patients with CRPC enrolled sequentially to receive vaccine + bintrafusp alfa (Arm 2.1), vaccine + bintrafusp alfa + NAI (Arm 2.2), and vaccine + bintrafusp alfa + NAI + epacadostat (Arm 2.3), with the primary objective to determine response rate. Adverse events in Arms 2.1 and 2.2 were manageable and consistent with the safety profiles of each agent individually, and notable for five individuals developing isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency. Arm 2.3 was closed early due to skin toxicity. Sustained declines in PSA were seen in 1/13 (8%) patients in Arm 2.1, 7/24 (29%) patients in Arm 2.2, including six with proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable tumors, and 0/6 (0%) patients in Arm 2.3. CONCLUSIONS: T cells, increased effector-to-suppressor immune cell ratios, and induction of cytotoxic immune gene programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03493945.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Redman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: