Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let R R be a connected 2-manifold without boundary obtained from a (possibly infinite) collection of polygons by identifying them along edges of equal length. Let V V be the set of vertices, and for every v ∈ V v ∈ V , let κ ( v ) κ (v) denote the (Gaussian) curvature of v v : 2 π 2 π minus the sum of incident polygon angles. Descartes showed that ∑ v ∈ V κ ( v ) = 4 π ∑ v ∈ V κ (v) = 4 π whenever R R may be realized as the surface of a convex polytope in R 3 R^3 . More generally, if R R is made of finitely many polygons, Euler’s formula is equivalent to the equation ∑ v ∈ V κ ( v ) = 2 π χ ( R ) ∑ v ∈ V κ (v) = 2 π χ (R) where χ ( R ) χ (R) is the Euler characteristic of R R . Our main theorem shows that whenever ∑ v ∈ V : κ ( v ) > 0 κ ( v ) ∑ v ∈ V : κ (v) > 0 κ (v) converges and there is a positive lower bound on the distance between any pair of vertices in R R , there exists a compact closed 2-manifold S S and an integer t t so that R R is homeomorphic to S S minus t t points, and further ∑ v ∈ V κ ( v ) ≤ 2 π χ ( S ) − 2 π t ∑ v ∈ V κ (v) ≤ 2 π χ (S) - 2 π t . In the special case when every polygon is regular of side length one and κ ( v ) > 0 κ (v) > 0 for every vertex v v , we apply our main theorem to deduce that R R is made of finitely many polygons and is homeomorphic to either the 2-sphere or to the projective plane. Further, we show that unless R R is a prism, antiprism, or the projective planar analogue of one of these that | V | ≤ 3444 |V| ≤ 3444 . This resolves a recent conjecture of Higuchi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeVos et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: