Key result
In a rat model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure, levosimendan infusion reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure compared to vehicle (both P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does levosimendan improve contractility in a rodent model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure?
RCT (n=24)
randomized
Does levosimendan improve contractility in a rodent model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure?
Levosimendan improves contractility by increasing calcium sensitivity in a rodent model of post-MI heart failure, though it also increases diastolic calcium.
Hypothesis-generating for levosimendan in rodent post-MI HF; human trials needed before any clinical consideration.
AIM: As few studies have presented a thorough analysis of the effect of levosimendan (LEV) on contractility, our purpose was to investigate in vivo cardiac function as well as in vitro cardiomyocyte function and calcium (Ca(2+) ) handling following LEV treatment. METHODS: Rats with post-myocardial infarction heart failure (HF) induced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery and sham-operated animals were randomized to the infusion of LEV (2.4 μg kg(-1) min(-1) ) or vehicle for 40 min. Echocardiographic examination was coupled to pressure-volume sampling in the left ventricle before (B) and after (40 min) infusion. Isolated left ventricular cardiomyocytes were studied in an epifluorescence microscope. RESULTS: HF LEV (n = 6), HF vehicle (n = 7), sham LEV (n = 5) and sham vehicle (n = 6) animals were included. LEV infusion compared to vehicle in HF animals reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure (both P < 0.001) and improved the slope of the preload-recruitable stroke work (P < 0.05). Administrating LEV to HF cardiomyocytes in vitro improved fractional shortening and Ca(2+) sensitivity index ratio, and increased the diastolic Ca(2+) (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In HF animals, LEV improved the contractility by increasing the Ca(2+) sensitivity. Furthermore loading conditions were changed, and LEV could consequently change organ perfusion. An observed increase in diastolic Ca(2+) following LEV treatment and clinical implications of this should be further addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolseth et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in post-myocardial infarction heart failure (n=24). Levosimendan vs. vehicle was evaluated on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure (p=<0.001). In a rat model of post-myocardial infarction heart failure, levosimendan infusion reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean arterial pressure compared to vehicle (both P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: