Key result
Inpatient initiation of dofetilide resulted in significantly higher QTc prolongation compared to sotalol, but showed no significant difference in pharmacological cardioversion rates (58% vs 62.5%, p=0.58).
Why the study?
Does dofetilide compared to sotalol improve pharmacological cardioversion rates and have a similar safety profile during inpatient initiation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=378)
No
Does dofetilide compared to sotalol improve pharmacological cardioversion rates and have a similar safety profile during inpatient initiation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 58% vs 62.5%
p-value: p=0.58
Inpatient initiation of dofetilide and sotalol for symptomatic atrial fibrillation showed similar rates of pharmacological cardioversion and adverse events, despite higher QTc prolongation with dofetilide.
Suggests sotalol may offer a safer QTc profile with comparable efficacy for AF cardioversion.
BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of two commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs, Dofetilide (DF) and Sotalol (SL), during inpatient drug initiation in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We performed a single center retrospective study of consecutive patients, admitted for initiation of either DF or SL, for AF between 2012 and 2015. Rates of successful cardioversion, QT interval prolongation, adverse events and drug discontinuations were calculated and compared. A two-tailed p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 378 patients, 298 (78.8%) received DF and 80 (21.2%) SL, mean age was 64 ± 11 years, 90% were Caucasians and 66% were males. Among the patients who remained in AF upon admission (DF: 215/298 (72%) vs. SL: 48/80 (60%)), no significant differences were noted in pharmacological cardioversion rates (DF: 125/215(58%) vs. SL: 30/48 (62.5%); p = 0.58). Baseline QTc was similar between the groups, with higher dose dependent QTc prolongation with DF (472.25± 31.3 vs. 458± 27.03; p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse events such as bradycardia (7.4% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.26), Torsades de pointes (1.3% vs. 1.2%; p = 1.00), and drug discontinuation (9.0% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.47) between the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2017 study conducted a cohort in Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=378). Dofetilide vs. Sotalol was evaluated on Pharmacological cardioversion (p=0.58). Inpatient initiation of dofetilide resulted in significantly higher QTc prolongation compared to sotalol, but showed no significant difference in pharmacological cardioversion rates (58% vs 62.5%, p=0.58).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: