Key result
Type 2 diabetes did not significantly impact short-term hemodynamic regulation during perioperative conditions in rats, with anesthesia having the largest hemodynamic impact.
Why the study?
Does type 2 diabetes alter the hemodynamic response to anesthesia and surgical incision in rats?
Does type 2 diabetes alter the hemodynamic response to anesthesia and surgical incision in rats?
In a rat model, type 2 diabetes did not significantly alter short-term hemodynamic regulation in response to anesthesia and surgical incision.
Suggests baseline metabolic status may not dictate acute perioperative hemodynamic instability; leaves open.
Diabetic patients have increased cardiac complications during surgery, possibly due to impaired autonomic regulation. Anesthesia lowers blood pressure and heart rate (HR), whereas surgical intervention has opposing effects. The interaction of anesthesia and surgical intervention on hemodynamics in diabetes is unknown, despite being a potential perioperative risk factor. We aimed to determine the effect of diabetes on the integrative interaction between hemodynamics, anesthesia, and surgical incision. Zucker type 2 diabetic rats (DM) and their nondiabetic littermates (ND) were implanted with an intravenous port for drug delivery, and a radiotelemeter to measure mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and derive HR (total n = 50). Hemodynamic pharmacological responses were assessed under conscious, isoflurane anesthesia (~2–2.5%), and anesthesia–surgical conditions; the latter performed as a laparotomy. MAP was not different between groups under conscious conditions (ND 120 ± 6 vs. DM 131 ± 4 mmHg, P > 0.05). Anesthesia reduced MAP, but not differently in DM (ND −30 ± 6 vs. DM −38 ± 4 ΔmmHg, P > 0.05). Despite adequate anesthesia, surgical incision increased MAP, which tended to be less in DM (ND +21 ± 4 vs. DM +13 ± 2 ΔmmHg, P = 0.052). Anesthesia disrupted central baroreflex HR responses to sympathetic activation (sodium nitroprusside 10 μg·kg−1, ND conscious 83 ± 13 vs. anesthetized 16 ± 5 Δbpm; P < 0.05) or to sympathetic withdrawal (phenylephrine 10 μg·kg−1, ND conscious −168 ± 37 vs. anesthetized −20 ± 6 Δbpm; P < 0.05) with no additional changes observed after surgical incision or during diabetes. During perioperative conditions, type 2 diabetes did not impact on short-term hemodynamic regulation. Anesthesia had the largest hemodynamic impact, whereas surgical effects were limited to modulation of baseline blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bussey et al. (2017) studied Type 2 diabetes (n=50). Type 2 diabetes vs. Nondiabetic littermates was evaluated on Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) under conscious conditions (p=>0.05). Type 2 diabetes did not significantly impact short-term hemodynamic regulation during perioperative conditions in rats, with anesthesia having the largest hemodynamic impact.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: