Key result
Drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared to bare-metal stents in acute coronary syndromes, but raise concerns regarding very late stent thrombosis.
Why the study?
Does the use of drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents improve outcomes and safety in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does the use of drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents improve outcomes and safety in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While DES reduce restenosis and TVR in ACS patients compared to BMS, their use is complicated by concerns over very late stent thrombosis.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been increasingly used over recent years during interventional procedures in patients with acute coronary syndromes including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI. In patients with either STEMI, non-STEMI, high-risk acute coronary syndromes with ECG changes or cardiac enzyme rises, PCI with bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation has been associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Therefore, BMS implantation during primary PCI in STEMI has become a standard of practice. With the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) in this decade, the use of these new devices instead of BMS in patients with STEMI has emerged as a rational PCI alternative in this particular subgroup of patients. In spite of the unquestionable benefits of DES in terms of reduction of restenosis and rates of target vessel revascularization, specific concerns have arisen regarding their long-term safety. A high incidence of very late stent thrombosis has bee...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfredo E. Rodríguez (2010) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes including STEMI and non-STEMI. Drug-eluting stents (DES) vs. Bare-metal stents (BMS) was evaluated. Drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis and target vessel revascularization compared to bare-metal stents in acute coronary syndromes, but raise concerns regarding very late stent thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: