Key result
A parsimonious index derived from previous admissions, time since last admission, age, and length of stay predicted 30-day readmission (OR 1.33 per unit; 95% CI 1.30-1.37).
Why the study?
It was uncertain how to create a parsimonious index predicting 30-day readmissions in acutely admitted internal medicine patients with equivalent predictive ability that can extrapolate to other settings.
Does a parsimonious index based on age, past hospitalizations, and length of stay predict 30-day readmissions as well as a complex model in acutely hospitalized internal medicine patients?
Observational
No
Does a parsimonious index based on age, past hospitalizations, and length of stay predict 30-day readmissions as well as a complex model in acutely hospitalized internal medicine patients?
A simple index using age, prior admissions, and length of stay can effectively predict 30-day readmission risk in internal medicine patients without needing lab or diagnosis data.
May support readmission risk stratification using routine data in internal medicine; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: There are various models attempting to predict 30-day readmissions of acutely admitted internal medicine patients. However, it is uncertain how to create a parsimonious index that has equivalent predictive ability and can be extrapolated to other settings. METHODS: We developed a regression equation to predict 30-day readmissions from all acute hospitalizations in internal medicine departments in a regional hospital in 2015-2016 and validated the model in 2019. The independent (predictor) variables were age, past hospitalizations, admission laboratory test results, length of stay in hospital and discharge diagnoses. We compared the predictive value of a logistic regression model and index that included discharge diagnoses and admission laboratory test results with one that included only age, past hospitalizations, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Readmission rates were associated with age, time since last hospitalization, number of previous hospitalizations, and length of stay, as well as with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive lung disease and congestive heart failure and several laboratory data. Logistic regressions of the independent variables for 30-day readmission rates were similar in 2015-2016 and 2019. An index was derived from number of previous admissions to hospitals, time since last admission, age, and length of stay. In 2019, for every unit of the index, the odds of readmission increased by 1.33 (95% CI- 1.30-1.37), and ranged from 2.1% to 37.1%. Addition of discharge diagnoses and laboratory variables did not significantly improve the risk differentiation of the index. The c-statistic for the final parsimonious model was 0.704. CONCLUSIONS: An index derived from the number of previous hospital admissions, days since last admission, age, and length of stay in days differentiated between the risks of readmission within 30 days without the need for discharge diagnosis and laboratory variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Froom et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Acutely hospitalized internal medicine patients. Parsimonious index (previous admissions, time since last admission, age, length of stay) was evaluated on 30-day readmission (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.30-1.37). A parsimonious index derived from previous admissions, time since last admission, age, and length of stay predicted 30-day readmission (OR 1.33 per unit; 95% CI 1.30-1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: