Multicenter retrospective study shows reduced survival after antibiotic use in advanced KRAS-mutated NSCLC on immunotherapy, indicating antibiotic-mediated disruption of treatment efficacy.
Background: Antibiotic exposure has been associated with reduced benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, evidence in patients with KRAS-mutated NSCLC remains limited. This study evaluated the associations of antibiotic and probiotic exposure with survival outcomes in patients with advanced KRAS-mutated NSCLC receiving ICIs. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced KRAS-mutated NSCLC who received at least one dose of ICI-based therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with survival outcomes. Results: A total of 101 patients were included, of whom 23 were exposed to antibiotics and 18 received probiotics. All patients had documented KRAS mutations. Eight patients received KRAS-targeted inhibitors after ICI progression, and none received KRAS-targeted inhibitors before or during ICI treatment. The median PFS was 9.0 months in the antibiotic-exposed group and 14.4 months in the non-antibiotic group (p = 0.041). The median OS was 23.5 and 38.4 months, respectively (p = 0.017). After multivariable adjustment, antibiotic exposure remained associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08–3.84; p = 0.029) and OS (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.30–6.22; p = 0.009). Probiotic exposure was not significantly associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions: Antibiotic exposure was associated with shorter PFS and OS in patients with advanced KRAS-mutated NSCLC receiving ICIs, whereas probiotic exposure was not significantly associated with survival outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: