Theoretical analysis reveals internal academic exclusion in Indian sociology, indicating that decolonial frameworks overlook regional power imbalances within the Global South.
What does it mean to think about decolonial theory and theory from the Global South from a region like Northeast India? Postcolonial practices of sociology in India were directed towards challenging colonial knowledge, simultaneously charting a distinct ‘Indian Sociology’. Exclusion of the Northeast from sociological discourse must be situated within the same power formations that make Western Sociology dominant. I argue that India’s Northeast is best understood as an academic periphery, underscoring the ways peripheries are products of power relations. I tease out its implications in two ways. First, while efforts such as decolonial theory seek to centre theories from the Global South, they fail to undermine the foundations of internal domination and hegemony in postcolonial countries such as India. Second, the unequal and uneven social science landscape produces ‘geographies of knowing’ and ‘geographies of ignorance’ (van Schendel, 2002), in which sociologists and the social science community have normalised ‘ignorance’ about the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roluahpuia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: