Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
S~~';:~l numerical examples are prese nte d for radio propagation over a three s ec tio n pa th. These are base d on formulas whic h were d erive d ea rli e r [ Fu rut s u, 1957a[ Fu rut s u, , 1957b[ Fu rut s u, , 1959[ Fu rut s u, , 1963 ; ; Furutsu , Wilkerso n, and Hart m ann, 1964J in whic h the he ight a nd the e lec trical properties of eac h sec ti on may be d iffe ren t. F irs t the path is assumed to be a land-sea-Iand path an d a sea-lan d-sea path wi th no he ight difference; t he atten u atio n using this model is obtained bot h for the fl a t earth a nd the sp he ri ca l earth and the val ues are compa red to s how th e asy m ptoti c approach of these two value s at sho rt distances. Seco nd , the e ffec t of th e he ight a nd width of a mesa is illu s trated and th e att e nuat icn valu es a re co m pared to the va lu es obtained wh e n the obs tac le is a knife-e dge of the s ame he ight. Next th e effec t of vary ing the rece iv e r he ight is prese nte d wh en the pat h is eit he r a sea-land-sea path or a la nd-sea-la nd path . F inall y, examp les of th e atten ua ti on ca use d by both a c ha nne l and an is land having bluffs are given whi c h illu s trate t he recove ry effect as we ll as the diffract ion loss in th e vic inity of the coastlin es.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. Furutsu (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: