Key result
Cardiac ERAS with on-table extubation linked to ~2-day shorter hospital stay vs. standard care.
Why the study?
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are less established in cardiac surgery, particularly in combination with on-table extubation.
Does implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery protocol with on-table extubation (RERACS) reduce postoperative length of stay and complications while improving recovery in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass or aortic valve replacement surgery?
Cohort (n=233)
No
Does implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery protocol with on-table extubation (RERACS) reduce postoperative length of stay and complications while improving recovery in patients undergoing elective coronary bypass or aortic valve replacement surgery?
Implementing a comprehensive Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERAS) protocol incorporating on-table extubation in low-risk elective coronary bypass and aortic valve replacement surgery is safe and significantly reduces ICU and hospital length of stay, catecholamine duration, delirium, and nosocomial infections.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice with ERAS and on-table extubation; leaves open confirmation in randomized cardiac surgery trials.
Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve clinical outcomes, shorten hospital length of stay (LOS), and reduce costs through a multidisciplinary perioperative approach. Although introduced in colorectal surgery, they are less established in cardiac surgery, especially in combination with on-table extubation (OTE). This study evaluates the impact of a novel ERAS concept with OTE (RERACS) in elective aortic-valve-replacement and coronary bypass surgery. Methods: In a monocentric study, we compared a prospective RERACS-group (n = 114) to a retrospective control group (n = 119) (TRIAL Registration (DRKS00031402). The RERACS concept contained multiple perioperative treatment measures such as respiratory training, short fasting, and OTE. The control group received standard care. Results: Primary endpoint: postoperative LOS. Secondary measurements: length of postoperative vasoactive drug support, duration of mechanical ventilation, complication rate, and patient satisfaction on the second postoperative day. RERACS patients showed significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (ICU: 40 ± 34 h vs. 56 ± 51 h, p = 0.005; hospital: 9 ± 4 d vs. 11 ± 6 d, p = 0.028), lower nosocomial infection rates (24% vs. 40%), fewer cases of postoperative cognitive dysfunction ((subsyndromal) delirium 40% vs. 57%), reduced nausea and vomiting (14.9% vs. 32.8%), and faster weaning from catecholamines (22 ± 30 h vs. 42 ± 48 h, p < 0.001), as well as high patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Our study indicated that an ERAS concept with OTE is safe and associated with faster and improved recovery, including lower catecholamine requirements, reduced LOS, and high patient satisfaction in low-risk cardiac surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Werner et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Elective coronary artery bypass surgery or aortic valve replacement surgery (n=233). Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery protocol with on-table extubation (RERACS) vs. Retrospective standard perioperative care with delayed extubation in the ICU was evaluated on Postoperative hospital length of stay (days) (p=0.028). Implementing an ERAS protocol with on-table extubation reduced postoperative ICU stay and hospital length of stay compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: