Key result
Age >75 years is linked to ~129% higher in-hospital mortality after acute Type A dissection repair.
Why the study?
The influence of age on outcomes among patients undergoing surgical repair for acute Type A aortic dissection remained incompletely characterized.
Does older age increase in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing surgical repair for acute Type A aortic dissection?
Observational (n=32,798)
Yes
Does older age increase in-hospital mortality in adults undergoing surgical repair for acute Type A aortic dissection?
Odds Ratio: 2.29 (95% CI 2.1–2.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 17.1% vs 8.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Advancing age, particularly >75 years, substantially increases the risk of in-hospital mortality after surgical repair of acute Type A aortic dissection.
BACKGROUND: Acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains a surgical emergency with high morbidity and mortality despite improvements in operative management. The influence of age on outcomes among patients undergoing surgical repair remains incompletely characterized. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2010-2018, 2020), we identified adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ATAAD who underwent surgical repair. Patients were stratified into 3 age groups (<65, 66-75, and >75 years). Weighted analyses compared demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and outcomes across groups. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, adjusting for comorbidities and hospital factors. RESULTS: Among 32,798 weighted admissions, 48.1% were aged <65 years, 23.3% were 66-75 years, and 28.6% were >75 years (median age 65 years). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 11.9%, increasing from 8.9% in younger patients to 17.1% in those >75 years (P < 0.001). Older adults had greater comorbidity burden (with most comorbidities differing significantly), shorter median length of stay (5 vs. 6 days, P < 0.001), and lower total hospital charges (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, age remained an independent predictor of mortality in patients 66-75 years old (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-1.63; P < 0.001) and in patients >75 years (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 2.10-2.5; P < 0.001). Larger hospitals demonstrated modestly higher adjusted mortality, while hospital teaching status was not independently associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Advancing age substantially increases in-hospital mortality after ATAAD repair. These findings emphasize the need for individualized operative decision-making, early referral to experienced centers, and system-level strategies to optimize outcomes for older adults with ATAAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=32,798). Age >75 years vs. Age <65 years was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 2.29, 95% CI 2.10-2.5, p=<0.001). Age >75 years was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality after acute Type A aortic dissection repair compared to patients <65 years (17.1% vs 8.9%; OR 2.29; 95% CI 2.10-2.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: