Key result
Among patients undergoing central repair and CABG for acute type A aortic dissection, surgical mortality was 13% in those with multi-organ malperfusion versus 15% in those with coronary malperfusion only (P=0.85).
Why the study?
The adequacy of central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting for acute type A aortic dissection patients with coronary and other organ malperfusion was unknown.
Does central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting provide acceptable outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion compared to those with coronary malperfusion only?
Cohort (n=21)
Does central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting provide acceptable outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion compared to those with coronary malperfusion only?
Absolute Event Rate: 13% vs 15%
p-value: p=0.85
Central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting yields comparable mortality in acute type A aortic dissection patients with multi-organ malperfusion versus those with isolated coronary malperfusion.
Central repair with CABG yields comparable mortality in multi-organ malperfusion; leaves open need for prospective validation before guiding practice.
OBJECTIVES: Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion syndrome is rare but associated with high mortality. Multi-organ malperfusion is an independent predictor of acute type A aortic dissection. Coronary malperfusion requires treatment, but it is not feasible to treat all malperfusions. The adequacy of "central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting" for patients with coronary and other organ malperfusion is unknown. METHODS: Of the 299 patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018, 21 patients with coronary malperfusion, who received cental repair with coronary artery graft bypass, were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided; into Group M (n = 13, coronary and other organ malperfusion) and Group O (n = 8, coronary malperfusion only). The patient background, surgical content, details of malperfusion, surgical mortality and morbidity, and long-term outcome were compared. RESULTS: There was no difference in operation time (205 ± 30 vs. 266 ± 88, p = 0.49), but the time from arrival to circulatory arrest tended to be shorter in Group M (81 vs. 134, p = 0.05). Among Group M, cerebral malperfusion was the most common at 92%. Two of the three cases with mesenteric malperfusion died. The mortality of Group M and Group O was 13% and 15% (P = 0.85), respectively. There was no difference in long-term mortality (p = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting is a sufficiently acceptable treatment for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion, including coronary malperfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minamidate et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion (n=21). Multi-organ malperfusion (coronary and other organ malperfusion) vs. Coronary malperfusion only was evaluated on Surgical mortality (p=0.85). Among patients undergoing central repair and CABG for acute type A aortic dissection, surgical mortality was 13% in those with multi-organ malperfusion versus 15% in those with coronary malperfusion only (P=0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: