Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The trajectory of a reflected shock wave has been measured near the end wall where the motion is perturbed by the displacement effect of heat transfer to the wall. In this experiment an x, t diagram of the reflection of an Ms = 4.08 shock wave was constructed by measuring shock arrival times with small probes. The parameter that measures the (negative) displacement thickness of the end-wall thermal layer, a ``Reynolds number'' R based on the shock velocity, the time after reflection, and the thermal diffusivity was varied between 9 and 600. In this range the measured deviation of the shock trajectory from ideal varied from 1½ to 17 shock thicknesses. The shock velocity was determined by differentiating a least-squares fit of the data to a fourth-order polynomial in R−½. In the range of the experiments the shock accelerated from a velocity that was 20% below ideal to one that was within 4% of ideal. Experiment agrees with boundary-layer theory above R = 150 for the shock trajectory and above R = 25 for the shock velocity, and implies that the exponent of the power-law dependence of the thermal conductivity on temperature is 0.81 ± 0.02. The small deviation of the shock velocity from boundary-layer theory predicted for R < 100 by higher-order theory is not observed, though since this theory falls just within the estimated experimental error this result is somewhat qualified. In any case, the unexpected agreement with first-order theory at small R indicates that molecular effects, such as temperature jump, do not play a large role when the shock is more than ten shock thicknesses from the end wall.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sturtevant et al. (1964) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: