Key result
Artificial neural networks demonstrated similar discriminating power to logistic regression models in predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and death in subjects undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Why the study?
Do artificial neural networks improve the prediction of reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and death compared to logistic regression models in patients undergoing CABG?
Observational (n=1,315)
No
Do artificial neural networks improve the prediction of reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and death compared to logistic regression models in patients undergoing CABG?
Artificial neural networks and logistic regression models have similar discriminating power in predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and death following CABG surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neural networks show no advantage over logistic regression for post-CABG outcome prediction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
INTRODUCTION: In coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery, the common complications are the need for reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) and death. Thus, a reliable model for the prognostic evaluation of those particular outcomes is a worthwhile pursuit. The existence of such a system would lead to better resource planning, cost reductions and an increased ability to guide preventive strategies. The aim of this study was to compare different methods - logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) - in accomplishing this goal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subjects undergoing CABG (n = 1315) were divided into training (n = 1053) and validation (n = 262) groups. The set of independent variables consisted of age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, diabetes, creatinine level, cardiopulmonary bypass, presence of preserved ventricular function, moderate and severe ventricular dysfunction and total number of grafts. The PMV was also an input for the prediction of death. The ability of ANN to discriminate outcomes was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the results were compared using a multivariate LR. RESULTS: The ROC curve areas for LR and ANN models, respectively, were: for reintubation 0.62 (CI: 0.50-0.75) and 0.65 (CI: 0.53-0.77); for PMV 0.67 (CI: 0.57-0.78) and 0.72 (CI: 0.64-0.81); and for death 0.86 (CI: 0.79-0.93) and 0.85 (CI: 0.80-0.91). No differences were observed between models. CONCLUSIONS: The ANN has similar discriminating power in predicting reintubation, PMV and death outcomes. Thus, both models may be applicable as a predictor for these outcomes in subjects undergoing CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendes et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=1,315). Artificial neural networks vs. Logistic regression was evaluated on Prediction of death (Area under the ROC curve) (AUC difference 0.003, 95% CI -0.039-0.047, p=0.87). Artificial neural networks demonstrated similar discriminating power to logistic regression models in predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and death in subjects undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: