Key result
Posterior cardiac drain placement after aortic valve replacement reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to usual drains (adjusted OR 0.270; 95% CI 0.077-0.953; p=0.042).
Why the study?
Pericardial effusion can cause inflammation leading to postoperative atrial fibrillation, so researchers evaluated whether placing a posterior cardiac drain to reduce early postoperative effusion prevents this arrhythmia.
Does a posterior cardiac drain reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=79)
No
Does a posterior cardiac drain reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Odds Ratio: 0.27 (95% CI 0.077–0.953)
Absolute Event Rate: 25.9% vs 48.1%
p-value: p=0.042
Placement of a posterior cardiac drain during aortic valve replacement may significantly reduce the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Posterior drain placement should not yet change practice after aortic valve replacement; this cohort analysis leaves open a reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation.
Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 27% to 40% of patients after cardiac surgery. One cause of postoperative atrial fibrillation is pericardial effusion, which can be a significant source of inflammation. In this study, we investigated the effect of a drain placed in a posterior site to the heart to reduce pericardial effusion in the early postoperative period to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation. Methods: Participants were patients who underwent initial standby aortic valve replacement at Saga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan from January 2010 to December 2021. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, complex surgery, or emergency surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups: those with a posterior cardiac drain in addition to the usual intrapericardial and subpleural drains from September 2017 (group P) and those without posterior cardiac drain from January 2010 to August 2017 (group N). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the usefulness of posterior cardiac drain. Results: Of the 79 patients included the study, 40 were male and groups P and N comprised 27 and 52 patients, respectively. Of the 79 patients, 32 developed postoperative atrial fibrillation; among whom, 7/27 (25.9%) had posterior cardiac drain and 25/52 (48.1%) had no posterior cardiac drain ( p = 0.09). When adjusted for body surface area, left ventricular end-diastolic and left atrial diameter, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in group P than in group N (adjusted odds ratio 0.270, 95% confidence interval 0.077–0.953, p = 0.042). Furthermore, no patient in the group P underwent postoperative thoracentesis in the subanalysis. Conclusions: The results suggest that early postoperative reduction of pericardial effusion by posterior cardiac drain placement may reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koga et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Postoperative atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement (n=79). Posterior cardiac drain vs. No posterior cardiac drain (usual intrapericardial and subpleural drains) was evaluated on Postoperative atrial fibrillation (adjusted OR 0.270, 95% CI 0.077-0.953, p=0.042). Posterior cardiac drain placement after aortic valve replacement reduced postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to usual drains (adjusted OR 0.270; 95% CI 0.077-0.953; p=0.042).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: