Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: The study aimed to determine the frequency and serological characteristics of anti-M antibody in patient population. Methods: It was a retrospective study over for a period of two years (April, 2016 to March, 2018). Blood grouping was performed by tube technique. In case of incompatible cross-match, antibody screening and identification were performed using LISS Coombs’ anti-human globulin (AHG) gel cards (Bio-Rad, Switzerland). Di-thiothreitol (DTT) treatment was also performed to demonstrate the existence of a potentially clinical significant IgG antibody. Results: The frequency of anti-M antibody was 0.05% in patients (51 out of 101,364 requisitions). DTT treatment could be done in 12 samples which showed it was IgM type in 11 (91.7%) and mixture of IgM and IgG type in 1 (8.3%) case. Transfusion history was present in 21 (41.2%), absent in 13 (25.5%), and not known in 17 (33.3%) patients. M antigen phenotyping in 42 patients showed that 41/42 patients were M-negative (six of them gave a “mixed-field” agglutination due to recent transfusion of M+ PRBC unit). The 42nd patient was typed as M+ which could be again due to history of recent transfusion of PRBC. Conclusion: Most of the anti-M antibodies were IgM type, however, serological characterization revealed the IgG type also which were found to be reactive at 37°C in AHG phase and thus clinically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: