Key result
The Fast Track pathway significantly improved physical health-related status (SF12 Physical Scores) 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery compared to Care-as-Usual.
Why the study?
Cost-containment strategies supporting rapid recovery and enhanced patient-reported outcomes are needed as hip and knee arthroplasty procedures increase, prompting evaluation of Fast Track pathways.
Does a Fast Track surgical pathway improve SF12 scores at 3 months in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery compared to Care-as-Usual?
Observational
Does a Fast Track surgical pathway improve SF12 scores at 3 months in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery compared to Care-as-Usual?
Fast Track pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty significantly improve patient-reported physical health status at 3 months compared to usual care.
May support Fast Track pathways in arthroplasty; leaves open randomized confirmation of physical health benefits.
Total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty procedures have steadily increased over the past few decades, and their use is expected to grow further, mainly due to an increasing number of elderly patients. Cost-containment strategies, supporting a rapid recovery with a positive functional outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and enhanced patient reported outcomes, are needed. A Fast Track surgical procedure (FT) is a coordinated perioperative approach aimed at expediting early mobilization and recovery following surgery and, accordingly, shortening the length of hospital stay (LOS), convalescence and costs. In this view, rapid rehabilitation surgery optimizes traditional rehabilitation methods by integrating evidence-based practices into the procedure. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of Fast Track versus Care-as-Usual surgical procedures and pathways (including rehabilitation) on a mid-term patient-reported outcome (PROs), the SF12 (with regard both to Physical and Mental Scores), 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, with the use of Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to address the issue of the comparability of the groups in a non-randomized study. We were interested in the evaluation of the entire pathways, including the postoperative rehabilitation stage, therefore, we only used early home discharge as a surrogate to differentiate between the Fast Track and Care-as-Usual rehabilitation pathways. Our study shows that the entire Fast Track pathway, which includes the post-operative rehabilitation stage, has a significantly positive impact on physical health-related status (SF12 Physical Scores), as perceived by patients 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery, as opposed to the standardized program, both in terms of the PROs score and the relative improvements observed, as compared with the minimum clinically important difference. This result encourages additional research into the effects of Fast Track rehabilitation on the entire process of care for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, focusing only on patient-reported outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campagner et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Hip or knee replacement surgery. Fast Track surgical procedure and pathway vs. Care-as-Usual surgical procedures and pathways was evaluated on SF12 (Physical and Mental Scores) 3 months after surgery. The Fast Track pathway significantly improved physical health-related status (SF12 Physical Scores) 3 months after hip or knee replacement surgery compared to Care-as-Usual.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: