Key result
Prophylactic postoperative beta-blocker use was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (10.22 vs 12.40 days; P=0.001) and a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (23.5% vs 28.4%; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does prophylactic postoperative beta-blockade reduce hospital length of stay and atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery?
Cohort (n=1,660)
No
Does prophylactic postoperative beta-blockade reduce hospital length of stay and atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 23.5% vs 28.4%
p-value: p=0.02
Prophylactic postoperative beta-blockade in cardiothoracic surgery patients is associated with reduced hospital length of stay, lower incidence of atrial fibrillation, and decreased mortality.
May support prophylactic beta-blockers after cardiothoracic surgery; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of hospital length of stay (LOS), overall mortality, pulmonary edema, and need for a balloon pump. A meta-analysis of 2 previous trials showed a nonsignificant reduction in LOS with postoperative beta-blockers but only encompassed 1200 patients, with few valve surgery patients, and neither study used a hospital within the US. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of postoperative beta-blockers on LOS and AF. Secondary endpoints of overall mortality, pulmonary edema, and need for an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) were also evaluated between groups. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort evaluation of all patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery at our institution between October 1999 and October 2003. Patients receiving prophylactic postoperative beta-blockers were matched (1:1) with patients not receiving prophylaxis for age >70 years, valvular surgery, history of AF, gender, and use of preoperative digoxin and beta-blockers. RESULTS: Patients (n = 1660) receiving postoperative beta-blockade had a reduction in LOS (mean +/- SD 10.22 +/- 11.38 vs 12.40 +/- 15.67; p = 0.001) and AF (23.5% vs 28.4%; p = 0.02). Mortality, pulmonary edema, and need for IABP were reduced by >50% (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively), while myocardial infarction and stroke were not significantly impacted. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational cohort study, prophylactic postoperative beta-blocker use was associated with shorter hospital LOS by an average of 2.2 days and a 17.3% lower incidence of AF. It may also be associated with reductions in overall mortality, pulmonary edema, and need for an IABP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Cardiothoracic surgery (n=1,660). Prophylactic postoperative beta-blockers vs. No prophylaxis was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation (p=0.02). Prophylactic postoperative beta-blocker use was associated with a shorter hospital length of stay (10.22 vs 12.40 days; P=0.001) and a lower incidence of atrial fibrillation (23.5% vs 28.4%; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: