Key result
Compliance with postoperative ERAS items was 66% in ERAS hospitals compared to 42% in non-ERAS hospitals (P=0.0053), with no patient-level characteristics identified as obstacles to implementation.
Why the study?
The ERAS protocol for colorectal cancer surgery was adopted by only a minority of hospitals in Piemonte, prompting an analysis to compare ERAS application between adopting and non-adopting regional hospitals and identify obstacles.
Does treatment in ERAS-adopting hospitals compared to non-ERAS hospitals show higher compliance to ERAS protocol items in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery?
Observational
cluster stepped-wedge
Yes
Does treatment in ERAS-adopting hospitals compared to non-ERAS hospitals show higher compliance to ERAS protocol items in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 66% vs 42%
p-value: p=0.0053
Several items of the ERAS protocol were poorly adopted in colorectal surgery units, particularly postoperative items, with no patient-level obstacles identified.
BACKGROUND: In 2019, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer surgery was adopted by a minority of hospitals in Piemonte (4.3 million inhabitants, north-west Italy). The present analysis aims to compare the level of application of the ERAS protocol between hospitals already adopting it (ERAS, N = 3) with the rest of the regional hospitals (non-ERAS, N = 28) and to identify possible obstacles to its application. METHODS: All patients surgically treated for a newly diagnosed colorectal cancer during September-November 2019, representing the baseline period of a randomized controlled trial with a cluster stepped-wedge design, were included. Indicators of compliance to the ERAS items were calculated overall and for groups of items (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) and analyzed with a multilevel linear model adjusting for patients' characteristics, considering centers as random effects. RESULTS: = 0.0053). For both groups of centers, the lowest level of compliance was recorded for postoperative items (42% and 66%). Sex, age, presence of comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were not associated with a different probability of compliance to the ERAS protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Several items of the ERAS protocol were poorly adopted in colorectal surgery units in the Piemonte region in the baseline period of the ERAS Colon-Rectum Piemonte study and in the ERAS group. No relevant obstacles to the ERAS protocol implementation were identified at patient level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pellegrino et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Colorectal cancer. ERAS protocol adoption vs. Non-ERAS hospitals was evaluated on Compliance to postoperative ERAS items (p=0.0053). Compliance with postoperative ERAS items was 66% in ERAS hospitals compared to 42% in non-ERAS hospitals (P=0.0053), with no patient-level characteristics identified as obstacles to implementation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: